The thing is, with both groups' objectives not parallel with each other, there will never ever be a meeting of minds. All we'll have are compromises which has what happened for the past 30 years and it has never worked. One party just can't give way to the other without violating the very objectives of their respective groups.
The PBA has allowed its players to suit up for the national team since "open basketball" came about in 1990. So far, no national team has replicated the success of the last national team that won the FIBA-Asia tournament (then called the Asian Basketball Confederation) - the 1986 team of Jacobs. Back then, we kept on saying we're the best in basketball in this region but the pro league's existence has prevented us to prove this to our rivals. Yet, our best finish was in 2013 when we won a silver medal at home and two years after in Changsha, as well as a silver medal placing as well in the 1990 Beijing Asian Games. That only proves that we're not Asia's best anymore.
Curiously, the last team that won the FIBA-Asia title did not have access to the players in the pros. They were culled from a bunch of collegiate players and reinforced by two naturalized players. Their secret was their ability to stay together as a unit for almost 5 years, expose themselves in the international competitions, while ensuring they kept in shape by participating as a guest team in the PBA.
The victorious 1986 national basketball team in the ABC
Gilas 1.0 under Coach Rajko Toroman
Where To?
Because of the fundamental differences of the PBA and the SBP, the only resolution really is to rely less on the PBA, as what Baldwin has previously declared. It has been done before - first, by Cojuangco's program that started as early as 1980 when he was project director for the sport, and second, in 2009 when Gilas 1.0 was put up by PBA former Commissioner and former SBP Project Director Noli Eala.
And the timing is ideal - it's ripe for the picking. With up and coming talents like Kai Sotto, AJ Edu, Dalph Panopio, Thirdy Ravena, Kobe Paras, Juan Gomez De Liano, Dwight Ramos, CJ Cansino, Dave Ildefonso, Rhenz Abando, among the top collegiate players today, the pool is deep enough to come up with a young, yet formidable, national team for the future. Add Jordan Clarkson in the mix and you have a potent national lineup that has the chance to beat any national team that the PBA can form in the future.
Fans would recall how the 1985 national team beat a PBA All-Star team reinforced by Francois Wise in 1985 in a benefit game for Mike Bilbao, who suffered a near fatal car accident along Alabang-Zapote Road in Muntinlupa. Similarly, Gilas 1.0 overpowered the Powerade national team of Guiao that played in Tianjin, China for the 2009 FIBA-Asia tourney. This scenario isn't unlikely again. It's not a matter of putting up a basketball team with the best players, but putting up the best basketball team. NCC and GIlas 1.0 proved that before. It can be replicated.
The 1985 Reinforced Conference champions
Photo courtesy of GMA Network
Stumbling Block
Of course, the PBA may end up nipping all these in the bud. Note that a recent rule by the league threatening to ban eligible players who won't join the draft is actually counter to any future plans of the SBP. If an amateur player is already eligible to join the draft but won't because he has to play for Gilas or the 3x3, it takes away his right to earn a living in the future once he declares himself ready for the pros. The SBP would now find itself in a tight situation where young players, for fear of being banned by the PBA, would eventually leave the national pool. I find it appalling that the country's blueprint to international basketball success is not anymore being blocked by the FIBA but by the PBA itself.
This would force the hand of the SBP now to cough up a little more than it should when giving allowances to the young players to stay in the amateur ranks. And given the timeline of Baldwin where 2023 would mean qualifying in the second round and 2027 for the medal rounds in the World Cup, the roadmap is long-term and would be very costly.
Again, this is because it runs counter to the PBA's own goals. Preventing top amateur players from joining the league would mean only the second-tier talents ending up in the draft. You can only imagine how the franchises are salivating for the opportunity to have the likes of Paras, Ravena, De Liano, Ramos, etc. in their rosters.
Future national team mainstays Kobe Paras and Thirdy Ravena
Win-Win Situation
There's a win-win proposition here, although I don't know if the PBA is amenable to such. If they don't want to remove the threat of the ban, then at least, exempt those players who were selected as part of the national pool (including 3x3). If a player wants to stay in the pool until 2027, then so be it. Threatening to ban players not joining the PBA when they're eligible is a draconian measure, especially considering the PBA has no relationship with any amateur player, and hence, may be questioned in court as a form of curtailment of human rights.
Second, allow the national team to play in PBA conferences to keep them competitive and in game shape. Adjust to the FIBA rules when the national team is participating, if only to ensure that the team won't have to adjust every single time. Make the calls fair and objective without partiality to any PBA team.
Third, when the national team plays in the PBA, make sure this happens on import-laced conferences. There's nothing more embarrassing than an all local PBA ballclub losing to an all-amateur team just like what happened twice in the past. Moreso, if they end up winning a PBA title, not unlike what NCC did in the 1985 Reinforced Conference when it swept and annihilated the Manila Beer Brewmasters in what is regarded as the most lopsided Finals ever, losing by an average of 25.5 per game.
In return, imagine the benefits the PBA will receive once those in the pool finally opt to turn pro. Not only will they be household names already, their talent stock would have risen considerably that they would be dominating the league in the next 5 years or so. Again, this is not without precedent. When the NCC program folded up, the PBA benefited when Hector Calma, Samboy Lim, Allan Caidic, Yves Dignadice, Pido Jarencio, Elmer Reyes, Franz Pumaren, etc. joined the league in 1986 and 1987. There was a resurgence in the interest in the pro league brought about by these young men. Similarly, in the 2011 draft, the Gilas 1.0 players also came in, ushering another new generation of players. Guys like Marcio Lassiter, JVee Casio, Chris Lutz, Mark Barroca, and Chris Tiu came aboard and the league once more ended up as the primary beneficiary.
Similarly, Marcial and company would not have to worry about schedule disruption, player adjustment, long seasons for players, etc., anymore. The PBA can go on with what they feel is best for them - 3 conferences, preferred number of imports, among others.
In the end, this won't just be a compromise, but a win-win deal for both as they fulfill their respective organization's mission statements.